Personal Values And Beliefs Theology Religion Essay

Personal Values And Beliefs Theology Religion Essay VALUES: Values describes, important belief in life shared by the member in the same culture about what is good and what is not. Values also create influence on a particular persons life and acts as a guideline. Compared with the great leaders, I also have some mutual values such as non-violence, truth, do good and helping the poor, fight against violence against women, drugs and others but, I stick to my own culture. It is a different value compared with the two leaders. BELIEFS: Beliefs are the rules, habit, and truth in our minds which are followed in our life for the survival. People have different beliefs in life that are usually passed by our parents and generations. The information source is the level of belief. It is also marked as assumptions, which made by ourselves. Compared to the great leaders, I added my culture as my belief and I am easy going man and I accept what is given to me by my parents. But, Mother Teresa and Gandhi have different beliefs. But their views are good. ATTITUDES: Attitudes are the combination of certain subjects from value and beliefs. Each people have different attitudes due to several reasons. Personal attitudes and values are almost similar and attitudes may be either positive or negative. Comparing my attitude with leaders, some of the attitudes are common and some differs. METAPROGRAMS: Metaprograms are filters to perception. There is several metaprograms. While comparing with the metaprogams of the good leaders mentioned above. My answers are different when comparing all the metaprogram with the Mother Teresa and Gandhi. TRAITS: Traits means how they interact with the people. It also means qualities or characteristics of a person. There is positive personal traits and negative personal traits also. Good leaders have traits such as honest, forward looking, intelligent and so on. Like that I mentioned some personal traits of the great leaders. While comparing, I have a personal trait that is thinking before doing. Comparing with them the only trait which I have different from them. Well the difference is because of the time this leaders were present that stands as history. STRATEGIES: Strategies allows us to work on achieving our goals. It is also a plan of action for the desired goals, also could be achievement of goals or solution to a problem. The personal strategy varies according to their nature. Here the two leaders have different strategies and my strategies are also different from them. But, some good leaders have some common personal strategies also. CONCLUSION: To conclude, that above I compared my values, beliefs and so on with the leaders. I analyses the each part of both leaders are different according to their personality and those leader have brought about changes in many peoples life and fought for them. PART B : Personal Development Plan (PDP) 1) What is My Current State I. What are my strengths that might influence my approach to leadership? Patience Hard working Humanity I dont give up I know my right and will fight for mine and for the people ii. What are my weaknesses that might influence my approach to leadership? not well manage Quick judge not aggressive sometimes dont speak up soft hearted iii. What are the common feedbacks (positive or negative) that I receive from others that might influence my approach to leadership? POSITIVE FEEDBACK: I socialize and make friends and enjoy Patience Willing to work Kind NEGATIVE FEEDBACK: Not well manage Not aggressive Lack of skills Lack of experience iv. What other performance indicators can I notice that might influence my approach to leadership? Quantitative indicator Directional indicator Financial indicator v. Conclusion: In conclusion I will say that I have to improve/focus on my leadership skills and personal weaknesses like: Time management Emotions control Internal Communication Expose myself and speak up more 2) What is my Desired State? Is to become a successful leader in any field of work either in a business field or political, sporting or any kind of leader, would lead the organization to its goal. What do I have to improve/achieve? Improve on my management skills bring about maturity in the way of thinking for a particular organization I would like to achieve my desired state by improving my leadership skills Why do I want to achieve that? What does it give me? Happiness Motivation Good satisfaction Satisfaction in life Achievement iii. What are my short-term outcomes? My short term outcome its help me in dealing with peoples and also help in work place to communicate and increase my performance and also creates better understanding and builds responsibility. iv. What are my long-term outcomes? My long term outcomes are it helps to increase my productivity and improve the standard of life How Do I Get There- What is needed? Through hard work and dedication what must I improve/learn/experience to achieve that desired state? improve my understanding and socalise integrate with people to know their needs participation ii) What are the possible resources to learn/experience/improve? Newspapers Handouts Internet 4) Timeline? I) When do I want or need to achieve the desired state? For short term 12 august to 24 December For long term 1 august 2012 to 13 December 2016 ii) What is my schedule to work on these focus area? Everyday life we go through different people and learn from their experiences and we set goals and work on them 2nd feb to 23th of dec spend 4-5 hours a week. Personality Type Report Your Personality Preferences EXTROVERT You are social and outgoing. You are most comfortable when with other people and experiencing the world first hand. Interaction with others and first hand experiences energize you. It is not unlike you to start conversations with strangers. You have a preference for the outer world: people, activities, and things. Other people provide you with a mirror, sounding board to help you develop ideas and plans. Being alone may sap your energies. Your concept of the world is derived from experiencing it firsthand and then drawing conclusions. SENSORY / INTUITIVE You appear to be an equal mix of both sensory and intuitive types. This may cause you some conflict at times. On the other hand the balance of the two may work just fine for you. There is certainly nothing wrong with having a fair share of both types if you are happy. Below you will find descriptions of both types.   SENSORY   You usually gather information with your senses: what you can see, hear, taste, touch and smell in the physical world. The facts gathered from the sensory data you process are the building blocks of your model of our world. You concentrate your energies on what actually exists and do not ponder what might exist too much. You are usually practical and rely on your common sense to guide you through the world. You see things as they are and have little or no need to search for underlying meanings.   INTUITIVE   While you do process information through your senses you add a twist to your processing by relying on intuition and serendipity. You look for undercurrents of meaning and abstractions in what you experience physically. You do not just see things just as they are, but as what they could be. While you may rely on common sense at times, you trust inspiration far more. PERCEIVING You like to have as much information as possible before making a decision. Putting off a final decision until the last moment does not make you uncomfortable. Indeed once a decision is made, a course plotted, you may feel a bit uneasy, because you feel bound to a certain course of action. You would much prefer to wait and see what happens. You enjoy the opportunity to improvise. Commitments are not etched in stone to you, and are changeable. FEELING   You make decisions subjectively based upon your values and what is important to you. How people will be affected by your decisions is important to you. You are likely to make decisions based upon what you feel is acceptable and agreeable rather than what is logical. Your truths are founded in your values and those of the society you live in. It is important to remember that we are discussing how you evaluate data and make decisions, and that you rely on your feelings to do so in no way implies you are overly emotional. Your Personality Type Your personality preferences suggest you may be one of two personality types, so both these types are listed below. Extrovert/Sensing/Feeling/Perceiving Your caring and generous nature makes helping others a pleasure for you. You are so full of energy, friendly and charming that some might describe you as the life of the party. You are not overly judgmental and accept others as they are. You steer your course through life by relying on your common sense. You are an optimist. New experiences are food for your soul.   In relationships you are the one that can bring light to the gloomiest situation. You are easygoing and very accepting of others. You are full of energy and need to share adventures with your friends and loved ones. You need attention and approval. You may not need a deep emotional bond, but you do need your relationships to be fun. You have a genuine concern for the plight of others.  Famous People of Your Type: St Mark, Dale Evans, Gracie Allen, Bob Hope, Eva Gabor, Willard Scott, Goldie Hawn, Kyle Petty, Arsenio Hall, Mary Lou Retton, Kathy Lee Gifford, Woody Harrelson.   Occupations Suited to Your Type Include: Animal handler, coach, designer, fitness instructor, flight attendant, fund-raiser, merchandiser, musician, nurse, performer, law officer, athlete, pr specialist, real-estate agent, salesperson, teacher, travel agent, and veterinarian. Extrovert/Intuitive/Feeling/Perceiving You are a very creative optimist who never has a shortage of new ideas. You accept others as they are, like to be helpful, and are compassionate. Your freedom and independence are very important to you. Your well-developed insight into others and communication skills allow you to inspire those around you. You have a good sense of humor and love to have fun.   In relationships you may turn intimacy into an all-encompassing pursuit. You are very aware of what those around you are thinking and doing. Your people skills allow you to make friends instantly and make almost anyone comfortable. You tend to idealize your relationships. You like your relationships to be very intenseyou want to feel everything. The warmth and affection you give others is very deep and genuine.   Famous People of Your Type: Franz Joseph Haydn, Samuel Clemens, Will Rogers, Buster Keaton, Theodor Dr.Seuss Geisel, Mickey Rooney, Carol Burnett, Paul Harvey, Elizabeth Montgomery, Bill Cosby, Dom Delouise, Dave Thomas, Martin Short, Meg Ryan, Robin Williams, Sandra Bullock, Robert Downey.   Occupations Suited to Your Type Include: Actor, artist, clergy, consultant, entertainer, entrepreneur, personal service provider, journalist, marketer, media specialist, mediator, recruiter, sales person, business owner, teacher, and writer. The  Enneagram  is a personality system which divides the entire human personality into nine behavioral tendencies, this is your score on each Type 1   Ã‚   Perfectionism |||||||||||||| 58% Type 2 Helpfulness |||||||||||||||| 70% Type 3 Image Focus |||||||||||||| 54% Type 4 Individualism |||||||||||||| 58% Type 5 Intellectualism |||||||||||||||||| 74% Type 6 Security Focus |||||||||||||||| 66% Type 7 Adventurousness |||||||||||||||||||| 82% Type 8 Aggressiveness |||||||||||||||||| 74% Type 9 Calmness |||||||||||| 50% type score type behavior motivation 7 20   I must be fun and entertained to survive. 5 18   I must be knowledgeable to survive. 8 18   I must be strong and in control to survive. 2 17   I must be helpful and caring to survive. 6 16   I must be secure and safe to survive. 1 14   I must be perfect and good to survive. 4 14   I must be unique/different to survive. 3 13   I must be impressive and attractive to survive. 9 12   I must maintain peace/calm to survive. Your main type is  Type 7   Your variant stacking is  sx/sp/so Your level of health is  very low, i.e. very unhealthy Your DISC personality test report Your specific distribution of scores on the DISC personality test is an indication of your unique personality. You can think of this as your DISC Personality DNA. In the pie chart below you see your distribution of scores. The highest percentage is likely to be your most dominant personality factor, the second highest your next most dominant personality factor and so on. As such for you the DISC factors are ordered as: Compliance, Steadiness, Dominance and Influence. The graph below shows how each team role fits you. After the graph, each team role is explained in detail, in the order of its importance to you.

How My Academic Background Will Help Me

The centerpiece of my college education was that it offered me a chance to read extensively, develop writing skills and learn to think logically, coherently and analytically. I developed and nurtured these skills inadvertently by participating in class discussions, group work and research papers. These tools have subsequently been useful in my personal and work experiences. The breadth and depth of my college curriculum offered me the chance to take classes that cut across a broad spectrum of academic disciplines. The relevance of such a broad educational preparation to management is that it helps widen the horizon of analytical, service and product possibilities. Nevertheless, I was cognizant of the need for me to acquire work experience to help ground my education in a practical framework prior to enrolling in graduate school. My choice of management as the area of career interest was not fortuitous. My relentless participation in extracurricular activities in college and the insights I gained helping my mother in her small business helped galvanize my interest in management training and MBA education. Hence my interest in a finance and brokerage operations work after college. By virtue of my three-year work experience, I have been exposed to several management challenges and opportunities. Perhaps most importantly, the challenges have reinforced my interest to seek modern management solutions. I am intrigued by the manner in which the various facets of management affect each other including finance, operations, human resources, marketing, strategy and information technology. My career plan has been to seek different experiences by virtue of six-month stints in different departments. In this connection, I have had assignments in corporate finance, brokerage and human resources, culminating in my current position in back-office operations and settlement. In the above roles, certain characteristics have been apparent to me as critical success factors. I have learned that the attributes of teamwork, initiative, sense of urgency and leadership are at the core of success in management activities. In graduate business school, I would seek to explore the intricacies of modern business management efforts, challenges and opportunities. Moreover, I intend to learn about the relationships of the various disciplines within management and how their interplay may be optimized to benefit a particular entity.

Adult moral reasoning

For an intellectual Fowler’s framework could be the next â€Å"big thing† in terms of serious theoretical positions on the formation of morality and moral reasoning and the substance of faith. In a human perspective, Fowler successfully attempted to provide a picture that illustrates and guides both the individual being studied and the observer/scientist via the stages (Berger, 1994).Though these stages are not as explicitly applicable to all persons, like other psychologists such as Erikson and Maslow, Fowler’s important contribution apparently is more than expansion of Kohlberg or Piaget. His own personal journey, lengthy and in-depth research has given him a solid premise to work on (Berger, 1994).My personal journey may probably be described closely in the perspective which is described by Fowler. I don’t have much experience and enough intellectual prowess and scholarship to be in the position to do a thorough critique on the theory and theorist.Howev er, since it is a personal response paper, there is one segment that I can truly say that speaks a lot about who I am and my own journey. For instance, faith and morality are intricately intertwined just as faith, ethics and values are almost synonymous (Berger, 1994).Fowler may be correct to a certain extent in attributing specific concepts which indeed are descriptive of universal experiences (Berger, 1994), and I cannot argue with this theorist on this issue. It is altogether important to me that individuals must come to grips to the effects of personal faith on conduct and decision making process, and such issues as personal priorities.It is when a person decides to commit to what may be attributed as a mystical Being (i.e., in the conception of God) that spells a difference to that person’s worldview or way of life. I would still like to argue with Fowler that he has reduced so much to an intellectual explanation something which cannot be explained since there is a diffe rence (in my perspective and understanding) between mere knowledge of God and real spirituality.I personally don’t like it when intellectuals and philosophers settle to â€Å"study God† or morality and departing from real substantive and life changing faith.Reference:Berger, K. S. (1994). The developing person through the life-span. (3rd ed). Worth.

On This Rock, I Will Build My Church - 2272 Words

Title: On this rock, I will build my church Verse: Matthew 16:13-20 13 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, Who do people say the Son of Man is? 14 They replied, Some say John the Baptist; others say Elijah; and still others, Jeremiah or one of the prophets. 15 But what about you? he asked. Who do you say I am? 16 Simon Peter answered, You are the Christ, the Son of the living God. 17 Jesus replied, Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for this was not revealed to you by man, but by my Father in heaven. 18 And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven; whatever†¦show more content†¦A lot of people think it is a full name, with Christ as a last name. However, this is not true. Jesus Christ is the shortest way of confessing our faith, saying that Jesus is our Christ. Two thousand years ago, there was a great distance between the words Jesus and Christ. It was difficult for the disciples of Jesus to confess that he is their Christ. For two thousand years, the Jews waited for their messiah. However, the Jews did not accept Jesus. The Jews thought that the Christ would have to come from a cloud in heaven. They thought that he would come in majesty and dignity, which is why they could not accept someone so weak. How did Jesus come onto earth? Jesus was born in a manger in the pen of a horse. So to accept this sort of Jesus who was born in such a low manner required great faith. In those days when nobody accepted Jesus as Christ, Peter confesses that Jesus is Christ. This is why this scene is so great and amazing, where Jesus is finally being confessed to as Christ. Also, this is a scene where after Peter confessed that Jesus was Christ, he received great blessings.This scene should not just be one that occurred two thousand years ago. This is a scen e that should be relived by us. Matthew 16:13 13 When Jesus came to the region of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, Who do people say the Son of Man is? Jesus asks here who other people say he is. Jesus asks how he is looked upon with the eyes of others. This